Re: Oracle Personal Edition Sucks!

From: Bob Jones <email_at_me.not>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 00:07:05 GMT
Message-ID: <JKd3g.74766$dW3.43568@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com>

"JEDIDIAH" <jedi_at_nomad.mishnet> wrote in message news:cimvh3-m5g.ln1_at_nomad.mishnet...
> On 2006-04-23, ianal Vista <ianal_vista_at_hotmail.com> wrote:

>> "Bob Jones" <email_at_me.not> wrote in
>> news:KAC2g.4831$Lm5.2557_at_newssvr12.news.prodigy.com:
>>
>>>
>>> <xg_at_oraclexg.com> wrote in message
>>> news:1145515759.282256.260060_at_u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...

> [deletia]

>>> Yup, Oracle may have gotten too carried away with the Java stuff. They
>>> are using it where ever possible. JVM is a problematic, memory
>>
>> such as exactly where?
>> "problematic"? such as where & demonstrated by which metrics?
>>
>>> robbing, slow beast we all have to put up with.
>>
>> Based upon which reproducable and measurable metrics compared to what?
>

> The tendency to leak memory, run amok and consume the resources
> of an entire machine. This tended to be the big problem in the last shop
> where a JVM based application server was used.

>

> Now Java apps aren't necessarily bad. Oracle just sets a bad example.

>

> Most Oracle GUI tools just encourage me to write more shell scripts
> and use sqlplus more.

>
> --

On top of that, Oracle apps use Oracle Java, IBM apps use IBM Java, and some other apps need Sun Java. Just think of what kind of mess you can run into. Received on Mon Apr 24 2006 - 19:07:05 CDT